Yesterday, Pete Hegseth, the nominee to lead the Department of Defense, faced a grueling confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee. For more than four hours, Hegseth faced questions about his ability to run the defence department, including its three million employees and a budget of over $700 billion.

Here are five key takeaways from the hearing:

1. Hegseth’s Lack of Direct Military Experience Raises Concerns

Several senators expressed concerns about Hegseth’s lack of direct military experience, citing his background as a Fox News commentator and think tank analyst. Hegseth pushed back, arguing that his experience as an Army National Guard officer and his time embedded with troops in Afghanistan and Iraq gave him a unique perspective on the military.

2. Hegseth Pledges to Support Military Modernization

Hegseth vowed to prioritize military modernization, citing the need to upgrade the US military’s technology and capabilities to stay ahead of emerging threats from China and Russia. He emphasized the importance of investing in advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and hypersonic missiles.

3. Senators Press Hegseth on Civil-Military Relations

Senators grilled Hegseth on his views on civil-military relations, particularly in light of his past criticism of senior military leaders. Hegseth acknowledged the importance of maintaining a strong, apolitical military, but also emphasized the need for military leaders to be willing to provide candid advice to civilian leaders.

4. Hegseth Commits to Supporting Military Families

Hegseth pledged to prioritize support for military families, citing the need to improve military housing, education, and healthcare. He also emphasized the importance of addressing the military’s ongoing struggles with suicide and mental health.

5. Confirmation Vote Remains Uncertain

Despite Hegseth’s efforts to address concerns, his confirmation remains uncertain. Several senators have expressed reservations about his nomination, citing concerns about his experience and temperament. The committee is expected to vote on his nomination in the coming weeks, but it remains unclear whether he will have enough support to be confirmed.